Replacing ECDSA (SECP256k1) with Schnorr signatures

Replacing ECDSA (SECP256k1) with Schnorr signatures

On March 23, 2017 the Bitcoin Core team published a technology roadmap, expressing their intent to replace ECDSA (SECP256k1) with Schnorr signatures: http://ift.tt/2mU7TX6.

Pardon my naive understanding, but we currently use ECDSA (SECP256k1) to generate public keys, and by extension- addresses. How does replacing the signing algorithm with a new signing algorithm not affect today's addressing? Does it? Where does backward compatibility fit in with this?

http://ift.tt/2inWOkV

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Need help to recover blpckchain.info wallet, my wife forgot her password and the brute force with btcrecover is not catching the password

When downloading the blockchain my application is become unusable, is there an issue with my code or am I using the BitcoinJ library incorrectly?

Mistakenly sent BTC from my personal wallet back to one of the exchange wallet addresses that I had received BTC from before - help recovering!