Is OP_RETURN combined with a hash, appropriate for proof of existence of an asset?

Is OP_RETURN combined with a hash, appropriate for proof of existence of an asset?

I want to store a hash (of a tweet) in a way that is :

  • Censorship proof
  • Public
  • Unchangeable
  • Persistent
  • Non centralized
  • Less expensive as possible, obviously free if possible

Technology offered by the blockchain seems to fit my needs.

Since I don't want to run my own blockchain because I didn't find a way to do it for free (or does it makes sense to run my own blockchain on my own server ?). After reading on the subject, I came up using an existing coin (Bitcoin ?) and as you may guess to the OP_RETURN field in a transaction. But storing my hash in that field is really appropriate ?

Can't I use other coins for that, or create my own coin ?

Since I will store lots (3k/day) of tweets, will it not be expensive to do so ?

https://ift.tt/2ELY0cs

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

bitcoin node: what is the difference between simnet and regtest?

How to check if Electrum is masking my IP with the Tor proxy?

Need help to recover blpckchain.info wallet, my wife forgot her password and the brute force with btcrecover is not catching the password